“They who must,
do.”
By Robert Agar-Hutton
27th Dec 2008.
The famous British military unit the
Special Air Service (SAS) have the regimental motto “Who
Dares, Wins.” So when I thought that I’d develop a motto for
the Protectics Personal Safety System (PPSS) their motto was
the seed for my “They who must, do”.
Now, I am quite clear in my mind that PPSS
as a whole is not a martial art (‘martial’ meaning from or
of war) although components of PPSS do come from martial
arts. However it is understandable that it is often
perceived simplistically as such and thus gets compared with
other martial arts as well as modern ‘reality based’ self
defence systems.
Now, it seems to me that there is another
phrase that should be considered it’s “Those that can don’t
need to and those that need to, can’t or don’t”. What do I
mean by that? I will explain.
First however a disclaimer, if someone
does martial arts ‘just for fun’ or for ‘health and
exercise’ reasons or for ‘learning an art-form’ or any other
reason that excludes using the physical skills that they are
learning for a self defence purpose then they are excluded
from the intent and meaning of this article.
However if you train with the intention
that the physical skills that you learn should be able to
aid you in a conflict situation then read on…
In my thirty-eight years of martial and
defensive arts training I have become convinced of the truth
of “Those that can don’t need to and those that need to,
can’t or don’t” by which I mean, that most of the people I
have trained with or know about who are rough, tough
fighters well capable of taking care of themselves and of
utilising the ‘deadly’ fighting skills that they have
learned. Actually don’t need the training they have had.
This is either because
a)
They never put themselves in harm’s way.
b)
They are so big and tough anyway that the training does little
more than to (perhaps) refine their natural aggressive fighting
ability.
You only need to look at some of the
awesome fighters who have been produced over the years from
many martial arts that are NOT combat orientated to see that
it is the man and not the art in almost all cases.
Also look at the people who teach Mixed
Martial Arts (MMA) or Reality Based Martial Arts or Combat
Arts (Krav Maga, Systema, etc.) and you will see that most
of them are active or ex-military or ex-police or just
simply really tough people. Now don’t get me wrong, I have
personally trained with many of those people and they are
knowledgeable, interesting, friendly people and great fun to
learn from. However that is not the point…
… What is the point? I suspect you are
asking. Well I’m getting there. Let’s look at the second
part of my quote “and those that need to, can’t or don’t.”
You see the people who REALLY need personal defensive skills
are those people who are physically weak and mentally
uncertain of what to do in a conflict situation. By and
large those people either train in martial arts that are
simply not fit for purpose or they don’t train at all.
Most people who are innocent victims of
‘street’ violence have had no training in any defensive
system. Note I say ‘innocent’, I acknowledge that between
the ages of (approximately) 15 and 25 many young males (and
some young females) will get involved in violence of one
sort or another as part of the ‘coming of age’ process.
Those aside, most people who get attacked, mugged or
whatever, are simply victims of random violence.
Wait a minute, did I say ‘random
violence’? There is virtually no such thing as ‘random
violence’. Yes you MIGHT be unlucky and be somewhere where a
crazed attacker with a gun starts shooting at everyone and
everything but most violence occurs when an attacker SELECTS
a potential victim and then proceeds to attack them for some
REASON using a METHOD. Now let’s look at each of ‘Select’,
‘Reason’ and ‘Method’ in turn.
| SELECT, an attacker selects a
victim because of some combination of the
following factors: |
| |
a) |
They look vulnerable. |
|
b) |
They have something of value. |
|
c) |
They have done something that the
attacker perceives as a threat. |
|
d) |
They are somewhere that the
attacker perceives as their territory. |
|
e) |
They match a ‘profile’ that the
attacker has (in either the attacker’s
conscious or sub-conscious mind) of intended
‘prey’. |
|
|
|
| REASON, an attacker attacks almost
always for a reason, either: |
|
a) |
To gain possessions. |
|
b) |
To impose their will. |
|
c) |
To gain pleasure from hurting
someone. |
|
d) |
To earn respect in the eyes of
others (or an other, or even themselves). |
|
|
|
| METHOD, an attacker will use a
method: |
|
a) |
Sometimes a sneak or unexpected
attack. |
|
b) |
Often an ‘interview’, a minor
verbal or physical challenge, that if the
interviewee fails to respond to appropriately,
then signals to the attacker that they are
‘prey’. |
|
c) |
Deception, lulling a potential
victim into a false sense of security or trying
to get the victim to a location where the
attacker has the advantage. |
|
d) |
Threat, using verbal or physical
force to coerce a victim to do what they want.
Also sometimes to move the victim to a location
where the attacker has the advantage. |
|
|
|
Now the above lists are far from
exhaustive, but hopefully do serve to show that ‘random
violence’ is rarely random.
Training in an appropriate personal safety
system teaches how to avoid looking and acting like a victim
and what to do if things start to go (or actually do go)
wrong.
But…
The problem is that most people who need
training keep coming up with reasons to not get trained and
some of those reasons are valid. It is true that most
martial and defensive arts training systems try and cater
for people who are physically strong. Indeed some styles
specialise in training in methods that would be dangerous to
do if you were not young and fit. So not very good for the
46 year old mother of five who is out of shape but worried
because purse snatching is rife in her local area. The first
rule for a personal safety system has to be that it is
SUITABLE FOR EVERYONE.
Now, don’t think for one moment that
personal fitness is not important, it is. The fitter you are
the more able you are to put up a spirited defence, the more
able you are to recover from injury if you are attacked and
yes, if you are attacked, you will probably be hurt. The
trick is to be lots less hurt than your attacker intended!!!
However from a training point of view there are two
important considerations. Fitness should definitely NOT be a
prerequisite of effective personal safety and that is a
major difference between system such as PPSS and many
others. Also fitness training should be tailored to the
individual and gentle and progressive.
The biggest reason for potential victims
not training is the ‘Ostrich Syndrome’ you may remember the
myth that when an Ostrich is attacked it hides its head in
the ground – the thinking being, if I can’t see my attacker,
they can’t see me… Well there are many people who honestly
believe that if they stay quiet, don’t go looking for
trouble and stay out of ‘bad’ neighbourhoods then all will
be well. Sadly that is not the case, there are no ‘good’
neighbourhoods, trouble can happen anywhere. You don’t need
to go looking for trouble, trouble is quite clever enough to
find you! And finally, staying quiet is often perceived by
predators as ‘prey behaviour’. So if you are unlucky, the
very things that some people think will protect them
actually puts them at risk.
So let’s get back to the beginning… “Those
who must, do.” When you realise that personal safety
training is necessary then you know that you ‘must’ and the
‘doing’ becomes easy. Once you have started training your
chances of being perceived as ‘prey’ reduce (dramatically in
some cases) and if you are unfortunate enough to be in a
conflict situation you will realise that it is a ‘must’ to
protect yourself and you will know what to ‘do’.
Return to articles page.
|